trailer for biblical movie stars

The Return of the Biblical Epic?

The Wall Street Journal reports that the cinematic return of the biblical epic is at hand. Russell Crowe will star in Noah, with a 148-foot ark, copious animals, and a $125 million budget. Steven Spielberg is in talks to direct Gods and Kings about Moses, Warner Bros. secured a script about Pontius Pilate, and 20th Century Fox is having Ridley Scott direct Exodus. Sony is developing The Redemption of Cain, while Lionsgate will distribute Mary, Mother of Christ, promoted as a prequel to the highly-successful The Passion of the Christ. Why?

There are compelling economic reasons for Hollywood to embrace the Good Book. The studios are increasingly reliant on source material with a built-in audience, something the Bible—the best-selling book in history—certainly has. And like the comic-book superheroes that movie companies have relied on for the past decade, biblical stories are easily recognizable to both domestic and the all-important foreign audiences. What’s more, they’re free: Studios don’t need to pay expensive licensing fees to adapt stories and characters already in the public domain.
With floods, plagues, burning bushes and parting seas, Bible movies make great vehicles for big-budget special effects, a key selling point for a wide swath of audience members. Paramount is hoping “Noah” will connect with religious Americans who “may not necessarily go to more than one or two movies a year,” said Paramount Vice Chairman Rob Moore.

Hollywood has been stagnant for some time. Many have observed that the more interesting creative stuff has been happening on cable and subscription television, pointing to series like the Sopranos, Dexter, 24, Breaking Bad, and Mad Men. Why the box office blues? The usual reasons are probably the correct reasons: Tickets and concessions are too expensive, especially in this economy; studios are risk-averse, given the immense amount of money it takes to produce a film; people would rather stay home in the comfort of their own entertainment dens; and many young men in particular get their thrills gaming now that games are as intense (and more interactive) than most action films.

TV also has the advantage of being able to do more in terms of story for less money. A successful series might run anywhere between 50 and 150 episodes for that many hours of TV. It also has the advantage of regularity: each and every week there’s an installment. This regularity is also why (many claim) NASCAR and the NFL are so popular. And episodes are sometimes available online legally at a network’s website, at Amazon streaming, or on iTunes mere hours after they air.

So will Biblical epics save Hollywood, or (rumors of its demise being greatly exaggerated) at least give it a shot in the arm? I’m dubious, for a couple reasons.

First, as The Passion of the Christ showed, practicing Christians of whatever stripe will pour into theaters to see a film that endeavors to present the story seriously and respectfully, whatever shortcomings scholars, theologians, and critics perceive. Conversely, there’s Evan Almighty, the Steve Carrell flop about Noah’s Ark. Those associated with the film came across in interviews as unserious, more New Age than Christian (or observantly Jewish), while the film itself took high tragic drama and turned it into farce, and poorly. Rotten Tomatoes thus records a score of 23% for it. And so whether or not Russell Crowe’s Noah film enthralls audiences and turns into box office boffo will depend on how well the film presents the drama of the biblical narrative. And it’s a brutal narrative; God Almighty drowns everyone and everything save Noah and his family and enough animals to start over. The temptation to present the story in more palatable ways will be substantial, and even if it were done in subtle ways, through oblique commentary here and there, the practicing Christians who would otherwise support the film can sense politically correct moves a mile away. (It’s not a biblical epic as such, but remember Ridley Scott’s Kingdom of Heaven? Don’t worry; no one else does either.) As the article notes:

The potential downside is significant, said Jonathan Bock, president of Grace Hill Media, a marketing firm that has helped several Hollywood studios target religious audiences. “You do it wrong, and not only are you not going to get your wider audience, but you’re not going to get your core,” he said.

Second, I’m not so sure we’re in a cultural moment where, as the article states, “biblical stories are easily recognizable to both domestic and the all-important foreign audiences.” I suppose most people know the basics of the story of Noah, but as a teacher of Bible who pays attention to wider cultural trends, I’m dubious that the broader population today knows and is interested in the great biblical stories anywhere near the same degree as the generation that first saw The Ten Commandments or Ben Hur or Quo Vadis.

But maybe I’m wrong; maybe Hollywood will score big with these films, while they provide Christians with an opportunity for witness and evangelism. Indeed, in the midst of the hand-wringing over The Passion of the Christ several years ago, in “Holy Hypocrisies,” a piece written before Mel Gibson’s more recent meltdowns, Richard Corliss at Time defended the film and suggested Hollywood follow Gibson’s lead and turn to the Bible for cinematic inspiration:

Decades ago, Hollywood regularly produced religious films: The Song of Bernadette, The Bells of St. Mary’s, The Miracle of Our Lady of Fatima. The bosses who financed these pictures may not have liked them or shared the beliefs expressed in them, but they had their reasons for greenlighting them. One is that they often made money. Another is that the mood of the country was more pious. Today, a fervent Christian conviction–so often aligned with belligerent conservatism–is, to many in the media, a threat or a joke. They don’t understand religious devotion, at least in the less attractive sense of the term. They are much more comfortable producing anti-religious entertainment (all the comedies that make mock of God, Jesus and the clergy) than some sweet sappy Nun’s Story.
The attitude goes beyond religion. For better or worse, the current tone is skeptical, derisive and gross. Years ago, American Pie replaced American piety. A lot of movie people don’t respect Gibson’s obsession with his Passion project; they are offended by it; fear it. And I’ll bet, since the movie could earn huge profits for Gibson and his distribution partners, they resent it.
It happens that I like R-rated movies, South Park, certain naughty songs and dirty jokes — and, with some strong reservations, The Passion of the Christ. And I don’t feel threatened that a lot of people who don’t ordinarily go to movies have flocked to Gibson’s film. Neither should the studios. Religious films could be a tattered genre Hollywood could revive, making a few bucks and a lot of converts to the old magic of movies. At least, it would indicate that liberal Hollywood isn’t afraid of serving up the occasional helping of traditional values alongside its usual smorgasbord of guns, fists, tits and smirk.

Posted in Blog.


  1. Pingback: Hollywood Gets Religion, Again » First Thoughts | A First Things Blog

  2. [url=]でも、たとえオンラインショッピング比較流行の欧米諸国は、「ネットオークション時計」の態度も少なくない。カルティエ コピーイギリス1家のジュエリーチェーン店金史密斯、自身のウェブサイトで販売正宗トップ腕時計、この挙動を獲得した当時、オメガ豪雅は、ティソやロンジンなど数十社の時計会社の公式応援を含む、しかしロレックス、ブライトリングを含むいくつかの腕時計大グループ当時はネット販売態度は慎重に、理由はこの類技術の制品を販売していない場合スタッフの専門知識を紹介し、不適合なネット販売。[/url]

  3. [url=]ティソは、スイスのイータunitas 6497手動巻き機械的運動として始まった。この運動は、しばしば選ばれるとき、白骨化はそれがすべてどのように働くのを見る多くのその内臓を掻き出すように本当にできました。それさえ巧みに白骨化したと刻まれたときは非常に美しく見えます基本的な運動を助けます。どんなティソここでしました。完全に白骨化した腕時計を提供します、しかし、1つのことをまだ読みやすいです。部分のダイヤルの詳細は以下の機転で時間と分の指標の全てを持つことになる。ロレックス スーパーコピー ブラックまたはシルバーダイヤルと来て、ティソのスポーティ・ローマ数字としては、24時間の時間分のフルスケールを使用しています。ダイヤルに切って、さかさまのキノコに似ている。この窓は時間に干渉しない、そして、あなたは右に移動します。[/url]

  4. [url=]Rolexスーパーコピー時計販売はROLEXコピー時計通販専門店です . 0.678244178 ロレックス時計のムーブメント:スイス製クォーツ . 品質保証、世界一流ロレックス時計スーパーコピー、精巧に作られたのスーパーコピーロレックス(N級品)2015年新作。[/url]

  5. [url=]上記のリンクで、あなたはiwc iwcのポルトガル年間カレンダーsihh 2015年頃デビューしたとき、私たちの最初のレポートを読むことができます。その後まもなく、我々はポルトガル語の「家族は本当に唯一の新しいバージョンであったことを経験することができました。我々は、まだわからないことは、文字通りの名前」をそれぞれのポルトガル語ポルトガル語iwcの腕時計への良い考えであったと確信します。バレンシアガバッグスーパーコピー」という名前かもしれない後者より歴史的に正確な」ブランドの歴史が我々のポルトガルの「ちょうど欠けないクラスと多くのロールを正確に舌」と言っているのは、英語を話す人に。なぜ、あなたはそのように何かのブランドの旗艦のドレスウォッチコレクションを増したい(ないとは思いませんが、私たちは、ポルトフィーノの彼らの旗艦のドレスウォッチですか?[/url]

  6. [url=]また1つの上位10位の選手はオメガ名人大使セルジオ・ガルシア(Sergio Garcia)、これはガルシアの第4回W杯。前に、彼はかつてデビュー2001、2004年と2005年の試合、今年は祖国を代表スペイン观澜湖までゴルフ会試合に参加する。ガルシアは2003年にオメガ名人大使大家庭も、今とオメガ協力6年ぶりに及ぶ。今年は手を携えてスペイン同胞Constancio塔ノ(Gonzalo Fernandez・Castano)と共に出場。ガルシア信じて優勝の鍵は相手を負かすことより、自分に「ここは何の優秀なチーム。実は、ワールドカップはいつも多くの優秀な選手が付いて参加し。私の最大の圧力から優勝自体を、私たちはこのために最大の努力を尽くす。ブルガリ時計スーパーコピー私は前に言った、ここには多くの非常に優れたチーム。私たちも一本の優れたチーム。もし私たちが私たちの才能を活かし、実際のレベルを打って、私達は優勝を目指す。」[/url]

  7. [url=]「2010年11月2日、上海]今日、世界トップクラスの腕時計ブランドロレックス上海で記者会見を開催すると発表し、栄光とゴルフ協会中国戦略パートナー関係を結ぶ。スーパーコピーブランドこの動きを意味ロレックスを中国でゴルフのプロセスには重要な一歩を踏み出したも伝えたブランドを全力で応援する発展の巨大な決意がゴルフ。[/url]

  8. [url=]エルメス時計スーパーコピー ビート秒針について非常にクールなことはそれがこのメカニズムが働く方法を見ることができる運動の白骨化したオーバービューが存在するということです。実際には、これは私が考えることができる最初の時間を私は死んでいる秒針が実行される(図を見た。私はディウィットの時間の2つの理由のためにこのようにして設計されたデウィット・学界は思っています。1つの特定のからくりを死者の秒針が動くのを許す見解を提供するために、第2のように微妙なのが「これは、確かにではなく、クォーツ時計です。」[/url]

  9. [url=]Millenary 4101ミレニアム腕時計はブランドの一番の注目作。頼り外観美実態は、完璧な技術と精密複雑な構造、腕時計の自然注目見とれ。機械装置を設置楕円型ケースの中に、現在その美。ムーブメントをAudemars Piguet(オーデマピゲ)独立研究開発、創製と生産の4101型自動的にムーブメントは、通常深い底の部分を余すところなく披露表。配備を下らない12枚板橋、巧みに配列が円弧状、優雅な現。八枚ゴールド?慣性もりを可変慣性摆轮も、目の前には世間。えこひいき時指針が法則を独立秒針盤、独創性。スーパーコピー時計すべての優れた機械設計完璧に溶け込んでMillenaryミレニアムシリーズの経典の特徴の中に:楕円文字盤、スクラブケースと研磨ベゼルの微妙なコントラストおよび偏心文字盤とローマ数字時間尺度。表のその立体感と技術の性能を。[/url]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *